Tuesday 13 May 2014

Not one but all for all

If the Indian society ever had to be compared to any food product, it would best qualify as a hamburger. Not just the single but double occurrence of the meat cutlet between the buns. The multiple layers in the Indian society form a hierarchy of social strata just like the tomato, bacon, cucumber, meat cutlet, onion, cheese slice, lettuce also repeating in the opposite order in some instances, form their hierarchy called burger. Both seem wobbly but still manage to stand still, look pretty. Eventually, when you take a bite, all the layers of junk submerge to the delight of your taste buds and it’s the taste of these submerged layers together that matters over the individual ones.

The Indian constitution is one of the longest in the world borrowing a few concepts from several Western constitutions (thus my comparison to the hamburger) and eventually forming an impressively unique constitution. We surely like to include and be everything from a democratic republic to a sovereign, socialist secular state. This inclines our society towards having a diverse nature which has given birth to several social and economic indicators, each comprising of layers. Any Indian college or university application form is a perfect representation of how many indicators of identity Indians have. Each of these indicators comprise of layers. It is only after filling one will you realize how many groups of community you belong to. The questions in the form will cover the social standing (i.e. layer) of a person in the context of religion to caste to the socio-economic background (i.e. the indicators) in the Indian society. Answering these strictly identity-categorizing questions will work in your favour most likely when you belong to the minority group that is the religious group the institution you are applying to, hails from. There is a rational behind this kind of categorizing which has made wonders in terms of expanding opportunities for the minority community but at the same it has left behind causalities along the way. These casualties belong to the General Category, a large chunk of layer belonging to undecided indicators. They do have their indicators but these aren’t in question here. They are the “general” Indians who are assigned only one indicator which is their academic merits while the non-general category might have “the merit tatkal” granting them quick entry. Why not assess all students on the relevant qualifications for the applied subject or job regardless of these indicators? Does the “General Category” have to be socially or religiously qualified to study something they have been toiling for a year or few?

The purpose of categorizing not just students but Indians even outside educational institutions can be worthy to defend but only to an extent. The idea of reservation has its angelic purposes to give equal opportunity to all but inadvertently it also creates a barrier between social communities just by naming caste or religion as a deciding factor in granting admission or a job. Why should caste or religion even be mentioned?  The argument could be that it does help a community build opportunities for their indigenous members. But couldn’t this also restrict them to eat the same “dal-chaawal” every day?  Why does any Indian have to reach a point where they have to rely only on their community for education or job opportunities? This might raise many questions and eye-brows. The point remains that building an India for a general category Indian, who is worthy of qualifying irrespective of the caste, religion or socio-economic background they belong to, will promise riches for the country. The efforts to make opportunity suited for every layer of the Indian society is commendable and rare. But simplifying the specific questions to one basic question that tests the individual’ aptitude, can put the deserving people in their deserving spots which can promise better prospects for every kind of Indian. Eradicating these divisions created by layers and treating all as belonging to just one layer may help. Lets stick to eating the hamburger as how gestalt has taught us and not make a “harm”burger out of it.


100 ways to show love

This is addressing an “intriguingly interesting” character, much to her dislike.

She is all the colors of the spectrum, every shade of white but sometimes just black. She reminds me of happy memories most of the times, well, almost. But what is more important about her that I remember is that she has the will to do whatever she likes without caring about second opinions. She listens and respects others’ judgments about her, but sorry second opinion holders; there is not much room for you guys in her monarchy. She is conscious about what familiar yet deceptive eyes conspire about her, still she manages to hold her own. She might fear speaking in public but she will voice every word of her thought in her mind when it comes to injustice either against her or anyone of her kind. I remember all the words that flow out of her brain when she counsels me. Every word is like a tarot card, be it in your favor or not it always ends up convincing you. The only difference is that her words actually make sense. She paints the reality for her patient.

She baffles me as to how she can express 10 moods in one day and yet hold the same charm and warm smile that she welcomed me with when I first met her. She might yell at or even slap you for being a bitch to her or yourself but the outcome of her bittersweet symphony always has a sweeter sound. That’s because she has 100 ways to show you how much she loves you. She is the only person who has shown me what being true to yourself can do for you by setting an example. She may think that she is not what she should be according to everyone around her but one thing I know that she is definitely true to herself. And that’s all that matters!

Someone with so much of love in her heart to give deserves a lot more.